Donate My RoSPA
    Basket is empty.
Net Total: £0.00

Avoiding penalties for health and safety breaches

Avoiding penalties for health and safety breaches

 

The sentencing guidelines for health and safety cases include high penalties for those who fail to comply with health and safety law. So, what do organisations’ senior managers need to do to avoid prosecution for themselves and their businesses? This article from Croner-i sets out essential background information and advice on implementing good practice along with highlighting some cases of prosecutions against those failing to do so.
 

Do managers have a personal responsibility to ensure good health and safety practices?

Yes, senior management teams play a key role in ensuring their businesses maintain good health and safety practices and avoid prosecution. Critically, there are two key legal instruments which allow for the personal prosecution — and potential prison sentences or large fines — for the failures of senior managers.

  • The Health and Safety at Work, etc Act 1974 (HSWA) specifically places duties on senior leaders. If a health and safety offence is due to the “consent, connivance or neglect” of senior staff members, they can be prosecuted personally.
  • The Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007, which places duties on senior management, applies to the way an organisation is managed or organised by “senior management” with breaches inviting large fines.

In addition, under the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007, organisations can be ordered to make details of the offence public. In the Sentencing Council’s 2016 Guidelines for the sentencing of health and safety breaches, penalties were increased. The impact of the sentencing guidelines means that:

  • • An accident need not occur for a prosecution to be brought; a breach of the law is sufficient
  • • The higher the risk of harm, the level of culpability and the more the people at risk — the penalty will increase, even if no one got hurt
  • • There is now no limit on fines in the magistrates’ court for health and safety offences; custodial sentences are much more common for individuals
  • • The guidelines require the courts to ensure that the penalty has a real economic impact on the organisation in relation to its turnover.

 

 

RoSPA Member? Login to your MyRoSPA to continue reading or join today

 
 
Login to you MyRoSPA account
Login to MyRoSPA to have your say on these consultations

Login
   
 
 

| Join RoSPA 

Become a member now
Become a member to access MyRoSPA to view more exclusive content

Join 
 


 
 

RoSPA Member? Login to your MyRoSPA to continue reading or join today

 
 
Login to you MyRoSPA account
Login to MyRoSPA to view some more exclusive content

Login
   
 
 
 

| Join RoSPA 

Become a member now
Become a part of the MyRoSPA team to view more exclusive content

Register
 


 

Contact Us

General Enquiries
+44 (0)121 248 2000
+44 (0)121 248 2001
[email protected]
Contact form